<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rails flag_shih_tzu Plugin with named_scope</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rngtng.com/2009/08/20/rails-flag_shih_tzu-plugin-with-named_scope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rngtng.com/2009/08/20/rails-flag_shih_tzu-plugin-with-named_scope/</link>
	<description>Featuring Ruby, Rails, Web development, Arduino, Processing, Nabaztag and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 02:35:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian Röbke</title>
		<link>http://www.rngtng.com/2009/08/20/rails-flag_shih_tzu-plugin-with-named_scope/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian Röbke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 08:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rngtng.com/?p=200#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Hi Tobi,

very good idea!

Please make sure to talk about &quot;named scopes&quot; instead of &quot;named routes&quot; here ;)

As said already via private msg, I would prefer dedicated named scopes like 
Spaceship.warpdrive.all und Spaceship.not_warpdrive.all
instead of the general ones using a symbol parameter.

We should then extend the tests to really use ActiveRecord and check the generated named scopes.

What do you think?

Thanks,
Sebastian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tobi,</p>
<p>very good idea!</p>
<p>Please make sure to talk about &#8220;named scopes&#8221; instead of &#8220;named routes&#8221; here <img src='http://www.rngtng.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As said already via private msg, I would prefer dedicated named scopes like<br />
Spaceship.warpdrive.all und Spaceship.not_warpdrive.all<br />
instead of the general ones using a symbol parameter.</p>
<p>We should then extend the tests to really use ActiveRecord and check the generated named scopes.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Sebastian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

